Posts Tagged ‘Sustainability’

Newer Entries »

Queensland Home Sustainability Declaration

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

?

SO THE STATEMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY? Queensland? A declaration? N of sustainability? ? a check list? No mandatory to be completed by the seller in case of sale, Townhouse House (first building class) or unit? (Class 2 buildings) from 1? January 2010 in Queensland. The declaration? N of sustainability? inform the buyer about the character? STIC sustainability? of a property? and community? increase concienciaci? n on the value of this character? up here.

The declaration? N identifies the character? STIC sustainability? homes in four? key areas:

? WHY? “THE DECLARATION? N OF SUSTAINABILITY? Est? N entering?

C? the growing concern? No change impacts on climate? tico and need? to improve the sustainability performance? of existing homes in Queensland. Encourage prospective buyers to make informed decisions about the sustainability performance? residential buildings? m? s and m? s? important. Properties? with higher n? number of character? STIC sustainability? potentially have m? s energy costs? to? low and use less water. Tambi? N may be more s? c? way to live and produce fewer emissions of greenhouse gases. Homes with character? STIC access and security may be more habitable for the occupants s at different stages of the cycle and can? reduce potential risks in the home, such as trips and ca? das.

The declaration? N aims to increase knowledge of the character? STIC sustainable housing when a property? are marketed for sale. Tambi? N can promote continuous improvement of financial and environmental benefits easier than ever to be developed with an character? LINE FANTASY spec? Ficas. It is hoped that the declaration? N will contribute? to promote sustainability? a house and become an indispensable marketing tool for real estate agents and private sellers.

DECLARATION? OF ADVERTISING need to refer to sustainability? S?. Ins? No new LEGISLATION? N, 1 January 2010 the estate agents ra? Ces and private sellers do not? You can place an advertisement for the sale of a property? less than advertising? includes information? n on d? nde a copy of the declaration? n of sustainability? pu? obtained. This requirement applies to advertisements in l? Line, the estate agency ra? Ces window list, the drops of buz? No advertising material and any other form of advertising. No ads on peri? Newspapers and magazines, or signs that it is not? N specs? Cally design ADOS to promote the sale of a property? (For example a gene? “Rich” for sale ‘sign). If requested, the declaration? N of sustainability? disposition should be made? n of a potential buyer.

IS ‘THE DECLARATION? N ask? to open inspection? S?. Whenever the house? for sale? open to the p? PUBLIC INSPECTION for? No, the seller must provide a copy of the declaration? n of sustainability? ? appears on the site or in the home. seller’s agent, however, no? must provide a copy of the declaration? n of sustainability? for any potential buyer.

“D” NDE I GET A COPY OF THE DECLARATION? N sustainability? The declaration? N of sustainability? ? available on the Department of Infrastructure and Planning? No website.

? a declaration? No sustainability “REQUEST FOR MESSI on the market before January 1, 2010? A declaration? n of sustainability? sar? the demand for homes, houses and drive? If the property does not it? been sold and will ? national market after that? s 1? January 2010, regardless of when the property was cializzate for sale.

Click here? to see the FAQ on the Declaration? n Queensland Sustainability?

We are currently maintaining southeast Queensland Gold Coast to Brisbane. To reserve your Declaration? N Sustainability? complete the form. For m? S information? N, call 1300 600 185

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Sustainable | No Comments »

In applying the concepts and reflecting on the history of sustainability

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

In the APPLICATION? N concepts and reflect on the history of sustainability? We? we (as individuals), and the way they want to support those working towards sustainability? ? Why? ? was the first revolution? No green? considered a failure in t? Terms of environment? ? Why? I think the second revolution? No green? a good idea? In the APPLICATION? N concepts and reflect on the history of sustainability? We? we (as individuals), and the way they want to support those working towards sustainability? ? Why? ? was the first revolution? No green? considered a failure in t? Terms of environment? ? Why? I think the second revolution? No green? a good idea? “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need but not greed? Of all men.” DISCUSSION GhandiThis? N? obviously related to the one we had last week. ? Qu? we must do to ensure that we are preparing a plan for sustainable development? Like us?-Emphasized? the importance of “good governance” in this debate, since? ? an important factor that determines whether a project? sustainable. Among others, a bad government? was one of the reasons why the first revolution? No green? failed. For the second revolution? N green, for ‘, let’s see how they good governance (in theory? A) plays an important role in changing the outcome of a pi? ? Success. The four principles of good governance (accountability?, La participation? Ny the decentralization? N, predictability? And transparency) are the m? S character? LINE FANTASY? or unless it possible for an officer of sustainable projects to be? success. First, we believe that duty? To note that we (the people) want to support our environment and our natural resources, first and foremost. Our pa? S / s economy? To global? certainly essential, but we will not be able to use the economy? term if the abuse actually running our economy? as worldwide. Balance our consumption of natural and environmental resources, therefore, be the first step towards sustainability?. Once you determine the second, we as individuals can? To work towards sustainability?, Our exercise of the right to participation? N. Once m? S, the participation? N? one of the four principles of good government, then we must understand that we are the main stakeholders and beneficiaries in the activities? development of each nation? n. Thus, it eliminates the risk of corruption? N by qui? N? energy? a, the reduced registration gap between rich and poor? was one of the main issues addressed by the GR. Julia Butterfly concept “to integrate sustainability? Through? S of the action? No individual? Was very interesting, and their actions are a bit extreme,” set out to prove a point and no s? So that, living in? redwood tree you want? to save … the key points I want to do now between questions and their actions have caused to be prompted by loggers and other members of the community?, discussions have started and saved? the redwoods for a short time … especially the thought process to start, but can not save the world alone, we can start a revolution? n. Sustainability?, I’m struggling with the fact that sustainable development really means to support all human activities … although I believe that sustainability? ? and you really need? the need? a real change? why? est resources? n decreasing as the nature and the environment est? No suffering, but what can? realistically be changed? We try to take a step back? So step forward? C? a way to take advantage of globalization? No, but the support is? ? The cloth of the third world countries under globalization? N da? Oo long-term aid? Balance between the determinants of sustainability? Help? transition? n to society? pi? sustainable and collaboration? n of cases. It almost seems that common sense, use, consumption is not too much of everything? well … Too much food can? because of a c Cancer of fat, the sun causes too, consumption, etc … reduce food intake help? U.S. aa m? s? one with respect to obesity? … … … cooperate to compete efficiently against Eco-efficiency/economic … In terms of production? N to become l? Leaders of ourselves and put in pr? PRACTICAL ways to help the production? N unsustainable. “Sustainability? Represents an idealized state of society? Where people live far away, dignified, c? Fashion and productive, satisfying their needs, ecological? Logically sound and socially equitable to avoid compromising the ability? From dem? S beings human to do the same now and in the remote control. future?, in effect, an attempt to unite the efforts of development and the conservation? n of the nature of a mutually supportive manner for the good com? n present and future the planet in the same way as in the pr? CTIC, the achievement of sustainability? is through? s sustainable development process -. discover, adoption, use, APPLICATION? No, the establishment of appropriate institutions and regu ? No, the pol? policies, strategies and technologies? as to produce a transition? n s? what moves the company? towards was the idealized image of existence. democracy? often considered in the same way as a process of working towards the ideal. “(Kertmath, 2007)” In the case of sustainability “, the ideal is to create two simult? neously spatially and temporally essential and universal conditions – the integrity? environment” and “social justice “-. to be maintained in the long term “(Kermath, 2007) The first Revolution? n Green was considered a failure by the bad government and rich farmers not to poor farmers are the chances? use of fuel subsidies and in turn causes? a greater income gap between rich and poor “(p. 74) The” Revolution? n Green 2? development agr-tail? necessary to achieve sustainable development in the world. What I like about second Revolution? No Green? that the five elements of the pol? est policy? working to promote sustainable development and a significant impact on the reduction? of Poverty?. For example, the first pol? policy “pol? policy of redistribution? n that pro-poor, facilit? foward access to impact with the ground and modern. “(P. 74) with luck, can? help the poor help as? themselves? qu? long na within all cases. “Good governance includes predictability?, Fair, COMPENSATION? n be? according to the law? Necessary for? Success of the pol? Redistributive policy. “(P. 74) A increased investment? N? Rainfed areas agr-tail in Asia and Am? America.” As an owner of livestock in Am? South America once and understandable? n of need? To level the ground and know that s? So why? A? Large area may rain, does not mean the company? Error. Many factors come into play and need to be understood. beggar in the p? Page 77 that? have taken a micro-pr? Stam? a good example of “show someone how to fish and feed them for life” to give someone the will? and the desire to learn can? give them an opportunity in change and respect. This allows them to produce their goods and earn a living. While microfinance is not? the fundamental way for change, as “microfinance can to help the working poor, but not” M “s in general? m? s poorest of the poor” (p. 77) In response to questions about the failures gene resources? ticos, some points are worthy of Mencius? n:. 1 – Despite her? Success, the production? N gene resources? Ticos favor large farms m? S small farms as leading to? a huge disparity between rich and poor ‘s the small farmers I have no say in the way it has worked in the GR (centralization? ny lack of participation? n), showing of bad governance 2 -?. The use of pesticides and fertilizers? works best in soils with a high degree of control of water, what happens to small farms as they can not afford these three technologies? as -? The GR was completely dependent on new technology? As, where resources are consumed at excessive levels in comparison? N with the GR2 that worked with nature, instead of the natural resources used in (launch of irrigation and drainage system) 4 -. The increase in production? N? has made the greatest? to? rice and wheat, leaving the regions in which this production? No it is not? very popular, struggling to find a way out of its food crisis, such as “Africa 5 -. greed? us? giving? gene resources? weather patterns in the past, and the day “or” GR2′s, sooner or later. We must find a way to develop pol? Policies and programs that are fair to all parties involved, destroy our country? S by the irrational use of resources. Woodfin Thomas? a writer of art? ass expert.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Sustainable | No Comments »

Three Challenges Defining Social-political Sustainability

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Copyright (c) 2008 Jackson Kern
The subtle difference between social development and socio-political sustainability is pure fundamental to the achievement of sustainable development. As the recent economic development if the results are announced unsustainable, so the social enrichment go hand in hand with a concerted effort to ensure their viability.
Open contested political spaces provide the only means of this endarenas you are contested. These three phenomena threaten the sustainability of our socio-political process, demanding specialized care.
1. The more insidious danger of all is the prevailing political apathy. If the general population can not be convinced that his destiny is sufficient to participate actively in the game, then the hope is surely lost. The causes of the apathy of many, the simplest is clearly inward looking people are more concerned with personal enrichment, social, or who believe that the benefits of social participation is not commensurate with the time and resources invested. This phenomenon can be compared with game theory and the concepts of political science of the “tragedy of the commons.” A case involving the political apathy is blind faith in social institutions and policies. But we must remember the accession of Sartre, who is loyal to a political and social set, and never stops to oppose it. “There is no contradiction in believing that the social and political processes of a nation are the best ever conceived by mankind, and is growing every day to challenge them. In fact, this is the very essence of democracy.
2. The existence of different social inertia of apathy. Human beings are creatures of habit. Although awareness and recognition of specific problems, which may be resistant spectrum to respond robustly through political mechanisms, if doing so involves a break with long-standing cultural tradition. In a 2006 survey, eighty-five percent of Americans expressed their belief that global warming is “probably happening,” while half said that the issue of global warming is “extremely important” to them. However, the spread of single-occupant vehicles on U.S. roads remain intact.
3. When the general public is involved and committed, this often can lead to problems of inefficiency and social policy. This problem can be especially serious in countries that are large in population and geography. The failure to reach consensus can sometimes lead to paralysis. Under an autocratic setting, the government may make changes in socio-political institutions at a speed that sometimes enviable. But this, of course, is advisory, political and social dimension of sustainability is guaranteed in the long term if it reflects the collective will. A different kind of political and social inefficiency occurs when there are obstacles to consensus, but when the channels to initiate change (particularly the judiciary) are forced, twisted or overload.
political apathy and social inertia can only be fought during the daily efforts to inform, arouse and provoke. Fortunately, political and social inefficiency can be addressed more methodically. Governments, businesses, nongovernmental organizations and nonprofit organizations to change and influence the state of our social and natural environment every day. Actors who try to bridge the gap between these entities and the general public and facilitate their interaction, aided by the extraordinary participation of new technologies have a significant role to play in the future sustainability of social-political.
The evocation of these challenges would be complete without an examination of the dynamic interactions generate political and social domain with other elements of sustainable development. Economics is the science of resource allocation, the study in ways that meet human needs and requirements. There is no more fundamental human need is food. In a telling example of the interdependence of sustainable development of the three components, increase in global food prices now constitute a serious threat to the sustainability of socio-political world. Just turn to the recent social unrest and political instability in Haiti, Egypt and the Philippines, to be sure. The increase in prices due to uncertainty about the sustainability of agricultural processes. To be precise, some are very explicitly mentioned in the West’s efforts to fund and promote production of biofuels as an inflationary factor leader (but growing middle class in India and China appear to be responsible for some other upward pressures on prices) . And all this as the viability of biofuels is part of a pervasive control.
These socio-political challenges of sustainability remain inextricably linked to the future of sustainability as a business.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Sustainable | No Comments »

Social-political Sustainability: the Human Element

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

Copyright (c) 2008 Jackson Kern

It is commonly accepted that the project of sustainable development is conceptually composed of three constituent parts. These parts are (1) environmental sustainability, (2) economic sustainability, and (3) social-political sustainability. The United Nations 2005 World Summit refers to the “interdependent and mutually reinforcing pillars” of sustainable development as environmental protection, economic development and social development. The interdependency of the first two is evident; it is perhaps the greatest challenge of our time to satisfy the needs and wants of burgeoning populations within the binding constraints imposed by our physical environment. But what is this great hoopla about social development and sustainability of politics, and what exactly is its place?

If environmental protection is concerned with the preservation of our natural environment and resources, and economic sustainability is concerned with seeking durable growth solutions therein, then the social-political sphere can be thought of as representative of the more purely human element in the equation. Social development and social-political sustainability are intimately related concepts but they are not in fact entirely interchangeable. It is important that we understand their symbiotic relationship and its implications for the broader sustainability project.

Social development is a concept that is familiar to most of us in its many and varying forms. Within any given society there are opportunities to improve and enrich each of its composite parts in many ways. Of sometimes greater importance is the need to harmonize relations amongst these various and sometimes opposing elements. Those actively engaged in the process of social development include agents acting within its institutions to effect change via established channels. Of more notice, however, are often those who act from the outside, those who reject the society’s institutions as inadequate, and who advocate wholesale social and political change as the only true path to social enrichment and development.

It is in this transformational role that we begin to touch on the realm of social-political sustainability. Within any given social context, social development can be pursued with the simple granting of budgets. Financial and human resources are utilized to strengthen and enrich societies by improving educational opportunities, by embracing the marginalized and the forgotten, by making improvements to healthcare and hygienic conditions and by endearing knowledge of financial and entrepreneurial activities to name just a few. Here, the distinguishing feature of social development is that it is executed within the institutional mechanisms and constraints prevailing in that given entity.

Social-political sustainability too is very much concerned with physical and material standing of peoples, but further than this it is concerned with the state of their civil society. Social-political sustainability is differentiated from pure social development in that its sphere is expanded beyond the employment of simply monetary means. Social-political development entails not only the engagement of institutional mechanisms, but also their modification and advancement. Social-political sustainability thus seeks pathways to durable social enrichment and development via the vibrancy and health of a society’s political processes. At its core, there ultimately is little more than an absolute faith in the functioning of liberal democracy. Despite the frequent changing of the guard and the potential for policy discontinuity this entails, it is believed that representative republican government bolstered by mass public awareness and participation provides the best model of a sustainable body politic.

In addition to social policy, environmental and economic policies are clearly dictated in the political realm as well. It is in the creed of the sustainability project to hold that healthy political bodies which are truly representative of the collective will can show us the path forward. Recognition of the strain to our natural environment that unrestrained industrialization and consumption have brought depends upon it.

The French political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville long ago warned Americans that their political structure (and indeed that of all democracies) could fall hostage to a “tyranny of the majority”. To illustrate the weight of these words, consider a scenario in which a pluralistic political majority were unwilling to adopt legislation which combatively addresses climate change issues, while the autocratic but highly environmentalist ruler of another nation prosecuted an aggressive climate change agenda with gusto. In the face of peril, such a situation would revive human moral and ethical dilemmas of the highest order.

Faith in democracy and the ideologies it espouses transcends the purely political arena. In a free and wealthy society, those in the pursuit of scientific truth battle only scientific obstacles. If the danger is real, the truth will be brought to bear. But even in the face of incontrovertible truth, can the titanic inertia of human complacency and comfort be overcome and conquered?

Many scientific and economic authorities now believe that emissions caps are insufficient in the battle against climate change. They call for a massive mobilization of public funds for investment in research with the goal of discovering new low-carbon-emissions technologies, and this on the scale of the Manhattan Project that delivered the first atomic bombs.

We will be watching. This, folks, is nothing less than a test of social-political sustainability in action.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Sustainable | No Comments »

Challenges and Mitigation Plans in Sustainability Implementation

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Sustainability is still in a premature stage and this is especially true for developing countries. There are common challenges that many people need to consider during the implementation of the concept. This article will explore these challenges and give suggestions on how to mitigate them. The challenges can be separated into three areas, namely internal, client, and government.

Internal challenges and mitigation

Internal challenge is the first thing that you need to face before you start implementing sustainability further. After all, if you do not clean up your backyard first, how you can convince other people to do the same. The common challenges from internal perspective are lack of support, lack of knowledge, and “more works” attitude.

The first thing that you need to do before implementing sustainability in your organization is to gain top management support and commitment. Without this support and commitment, sustainability implementation will not achieve a successful outcome. This may sound easy, but the reality can be different. It is important for you to explore the benefits of sustainability for the organization. Then you need to explain these benefits in term of economic value whenever possible. This is the best way to convince your top management to approve the implementation.

Sometimes, even if top management has agreed to implement the concept, the problem is nobody understand how to do it. Lack of knowledge is a big issue, especially because sustainability concept is relatively new for many people. In this case, you need to prepare awareness programs to increase the knowledge and understanding of people in your organization. You need to explain implicitly the necessity of sustainability for the organization as well as the earth in general. You also can give external trainings to certain people so they can support you to implement the concept.

Another problem is “more works” attitude. When people hear that the organization will implement a new concept, the first thing that comes to their mind is I have to do more works because of this. Again your awareness programs should be able to tackle this issue as long as you can explain the importance of sustainability. Another strategy is to make a sustainability performance review. For example, people who have a good performance in terms of sustainability implementation will receive financial reward or other benefits.

Client challenges and mitigation

Clients can become a huge source of challenges, especially in construction industry, because they are the ones who pay for your service. The common challenges from client side are cost and cynicism. Sometimes it is very difficult to convince clients to spend more initial investment for sustainability implementation. You can mitigate this problem by explaining the benefit of sustainability in terms of life-cycle cost. You need to make them understand that sustainability will bring benefits in the long run. Another strategy is to show previous case studies and what they have achieved because of their sustainability commitment.

Government challenges and mitigation

The challenges related with government are lack of regulation and enforcement concerning sustainability, sustainability is still in premature stage and not a priority because to some countries, they may have more urgent issues. Actually, this situation can become an opportunity for you. You can attract government attention because of your sustainability implementation. You can collaborate with them and become a good example, which will increase your organization marketing value significantly. Another opportunity is to become the first in something sustainable. For example, the first building to have solar panel, the first zero carbon neutral organization, the first green certified office, etc.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Sustainable | No Comments »

Newer Entries »